Motorola V325 vs Micromax Q35

Comparing the Motorola V325 vs Micromax Q35 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Motorola V325 and Micromax Q35 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Motorola V325 offers a higher battery capacity with 820 mAh, while Micromax Q35 offers 1050 mAh, making Motorola V325 better for longer battery life.

Motorola V325

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q35

₹3,835

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

30 Dec, 2005

22 Jun, 2011

Display

N/A	2.20 inches (5.59 cm)
LCD	LCD
176x220 px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

820 mAh

1050 mAh

Storage

32 MB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3.1/5 (33 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.20 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

176x220 px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

23.3 %

Design

Height

91 mm

111 mm

Width

49 mm

58 mm

Thickness

24.00 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

116 grams

106 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

820 mAh

1050 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3.3(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

32 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v1.1

Yes

GPS

Yes with A-GPS

N/A

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 MIDI with 2.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 500 Entries

Yes

SMS

N/A

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Voice Commands Screensavers Wallpapers Calculator Calendar Alarm Clock To-Do List

N/A