Nokia 2.2 vs Infinix Smart 3 Plus

Comparing the Nokia 2.2 vs Infinix Smart 3 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Both Nokia 2.2 and Infinix Smart 3 Plus run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.

Display: Infinix Smart 3 Plus offers a screen size of 6.21 inches, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5.71 inches, making Infinix Smart 3 Plus the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 2.2 and Infinix Smart 3 Plus feature the same IPS LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both Nokia 2.2 and Infinix Smart 3 Plus feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: Infinix Smart 3 Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5 MP, making Infinix Smart 3 Plus better for front camera photography.

Battery: Infinix Smart 3 Plus offers a higher battery capacity with 3500 mAh, while Nokia 2.2 offers 3000 mAh, making Infinix Smart 3 Plus better for longer battery life.

Storage: Infinix Smart 3 Plus offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while Nokia 2.2 offers 16 GB, making Infinix Smart 3 Plus the better option for storage.

User Rating: Infinix Smart 3 Plus receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Nokia 2.2 has a rating of 3.8.

Nokia 2.2

₹8,599

(Out of Stock)

Infinix Smart 3 Plus

₹7,999

(Out of Stock)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

69%

70%

Release Date

10 Jun, 2019

30 Apr, 2019

Performance


MediaTek Helio A22	MediaTek Helio A22
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)	Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
2 GB RAM	2 GB RAM

Display


5.71 inches (14.5 cm)	6.21 inches (15.77 cm)
IPS LCD	IPS LCD
720x1520 px (HD+)	720x1520 px (HD+)

Rear Camera


13 MP Primary Camera	13 MP Primary Camera
N/A	2 MP Depth Camera

Front Camera


5 MP	8 MP

Battery


3000 mAh	3500 mAh
No Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

16 GB	32 GB
eMMC 5.1	eMMC 5.1

User Ratings

3.8/5

(4,883 ratings)

4.2/5

(80,674 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

65,184 AnTuTu Score	N/A
12h 19m Battery Life (PC Mark)	N/A

Compare in 360 View

Video

1 Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Jun 10, 2019

(Official)

Apr 30, 2019

(Official)

Operating System

Android v9.0 (Pie)

Custom UI

Android One

N/A

Performance

Performance Rating

Avg

Chipset

MediaTek Helio A22

Processor

Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

12 nm

N/A

Graphics (GPU)

PowerVR GE8300

RAM

2 GB / 3 GB

2 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR3

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

65,184

N/A

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

30.0 s

N/A

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Display Type

IPS LCD

Screen Size

5.71 inches (14.5 cm)

6.21 inches (15.77 cm)

Resolution

720x1520 px (HD+)

Aspect Ratio

19:9

19.5:9

Pixel Density

295 ppi

271 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

78.73 %

80.27 %

Bezel-less Display

Yes with waterdrop notch

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

N/A

88 %

Design

Height

145.9 mm

157 mm

Width

70.5 mm

76 mm

Thickness

9.3 mm

7.8 mm

Weight

153 grams

148 grams

Build Material

Back: Polycarbonate

Back: Plastic

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Good

Resolution

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8

N/A	2 MP Depth Camera

Autofocus

Yes	Yes Phase Detection Autofocus

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Yes Dual LED Flash

Image Resolution

4128 x 3096 Pixels

Settings

Exposure compensation ISO control

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps

N/A

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Good

Resolution

5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size

8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera

Flash

N/A	Yes Screen flash

Camera Features

Fixed Focus

N/A

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

3000 mAh

3500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

12h 19m

N/A

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

2h 55m 45s

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

16 GB / 32 GB

32 GB

Storage Type

eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 400 GB

Yes Up to 256 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G Not Supported 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)

Wi-Fi Features

Mobile Hotspot

Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v4.2

Yes v5.0

GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass

Yes with A-GPS

NFC

N/A

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

Yes

Fingerprint Sensor Position

N/A

Rear

Other Sensors

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass