|
69%
Nokia 2.2
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Micromax iOne Note
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 2.2 vs Micromax iOne Note
Comparing the Nokia 2.2 vs Micromax iOne Note across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Nokia 2.2 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Micromax iOne Note runs at 1.6 GHz, making Nokia 2.2 the better performer.
Display: Micromax iOne Note offers a screen size of 6.08 inches, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5.71 inches, making Micromax iOne Note the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 2.2 and Micromax iOne Note feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Nokia 2.2 and Micromax iOne Note feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Nokia 2.2 and Micromax iOne Note feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Micromax iOne Note offers a higher battery capacity with 3950 mAh, while Nokia 2.2 offers 3000 mAh, making Micromax iOne Note better for longer battery life.
Storage: Micromax iOne Note offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while Nokia 2.2 offers 16 GB, making Micromax iOne Note the better option for storage.
User Rating: Micromax iOne Note receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Nokia 2.2 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Nokia 2.2
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Micromax iOne Note
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
10 Jun, 2019
|
28 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
3000 mAh
|
3950 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(4,883 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(32 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
65,184
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
12h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 10, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
RAM
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
65,184
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
30.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
295 ppi
|
283 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
78.73 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
145.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
70.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
153 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
3950 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 19m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 55m 45s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 400 GB
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|