|
69%
Nokia 2.3
₹8,120
(Out of Stock)
|
Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 2.3 vs Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
Comparing the Nokia 2.3 vs Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Nokia 2.3 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus runs at 1.5 GHz, making Nokia 2.3 the better performer.
Display: Nokia 2.3 offers a screen size of 6.2 inches, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 6.1 inches, making Nokia 2.3 the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 2.3 and Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Nokia 2.3 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 8 MP, making Nokia 2.3 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Nokia 2.3 and Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Nokia 2.3 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 3000 mAh, making Nokia 2.3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Nokia 2.3 offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus offers 16 GB, making Nokia 2.3 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Nokia 2.3 receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Nokia 2.3
₹8,120
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S9 Plus
₹5,299
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Dec, 2019
|
20 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
N/A
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
600x1280 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
16 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(3,001 ratings)
|
3.3/5
(377 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
17h 26m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 27, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 20, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
6.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
600x1280 px
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
N/A
|
Pixel Density
|
271 ppi
|
232 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.34 %
|
81.68 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
157.6 mm
|
155.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
72.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
9.7 mm
|
Weight
|
183 grams
|
163.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 12 Hours(2G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 26m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
5h 7m 46s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.82 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|