Nokia 2.3 vs vivo Y19e

Share  

Comparing the Nokia 2.3 vs vivo Y19e across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Nokia 2.3 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while vivo Y19e runs at 1.8 GHz, making Nokia 2.3 the better performer.


Display: vivo Y19e offers a screen size of 6.74 inches, while Nokia 2.3 offers 6.2 inches, making vivo Y19e the larger display of the two. Nokia 2.3 features a IPS LCD display compared to vivo Y19e's LCD, making Nokia 2.3 the better display of the two.


Rear Camera: Both Nokia 2.3 and vivo Y19e feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.


Front Camera: Both Nokia 2.3 and vivo Y19e feature a 5 MP primary front camera.


Battery: vivo Y19e offers a higher battery capacity with 5500 mAh, while Nokia 2.3 offers 4000 mAh, making vivo Y19e better for longer battery life.


Storage: vivo Y19e offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Nokia 2.3 offers 32 GB, making vivo Y19e the better option for storage.


User Rating: vivo Y19e receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Nokia 2.3 has a rating of 3.8.

...read more
Nokia 2.3
₹8,120
(Out of Stock)
vivo Y19e
₹7,989
(Out of Stock)
Add to Compare

Summary

Spec Score

69%
72%

Release Date

27 Dec, 2019
20 Mar, 2025

Performance

MediaTek Helio A22
Unisoc T7225
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
2 GB RAM
4 GB RAM

Display

6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
6.74 inches (17.12 cm)
IPS LCD
LCD
720x1520 px (HD+)
720x1600 px (HD+)
N/A
90 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera

13 MP
Primary Camera
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
2 MP
Depth Camera
0.08 MP
Camera

Front Camera

5 MP
5 MP

Battery

4000 mAh
5500 mAh
N/A
15W Fast Charging
No Wireless Charging
No Wireless Charging

Storage

32 GB
64 GB
eMMC 5.1
eMMC 5.1

User Ratings

3.8/5
(3,001 ratings)
4.2/5
(4,668 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

17h 26m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
N/A

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Dec 27, 2019
(Official)
Mar 20, 2025
(Official)

Operating System

Android v9.0 (Pie)
Android v14

Custom UI

Android One
Funtouch OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Avg
Good

Chipset

MediaTek Helio A22
Unisoc T7225

Processor

Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
Octa core

1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit
64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

12 nm
12 nm

Graphics (GPU)

PowerVR GE8300
Mali-G52 MP1

RAM

2 GB
4 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR3
LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

29.0 s
N/A

Display

Display Rating

Excellent
Very Good

Display Type

IPS LCD
LCD

Screen Size

6.2 inches  (15.75 cm)
6.74 inches  (17.12 cm)

Resolution

720x1520 px (HD+)
720x1600 px (HD+)

Peak Brightness

N/A
570 nits

HBM Brightness

N/A
570 nits

Refresh Rate

N/A
90 Hz

Aspect Ratio

19:9
20:9

Pixel Density

271 ppi
260 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

80.34 %
85.19 %

Bezel-less Display

Yes with waterdrop notch
Yes with punch-hole display

Design

Height

157.6 mm
167.30 mm

Width

75.4 mm
76.95 mm

Thickness

8.6 mm
8.19 mm

Weight

183 grams
199 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic
Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

N/A
Yes Splash proof IP64

Ruggedness

N/A
Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Good
Good

Resolution

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle
2 MP
Depth Camera
0.08 MP
f/3.0

Autofocus

Yes
Yes

Flash

Yes LED Flash
Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

4128 x 3096 Pixels
4128 x 3096 Pixels

Settings

Exposure compensation ISO control
Exposure compensation ISO control

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Good
Very Good

Resolution

5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good
Very Good

Capacity

4000 mAh
5500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

Quick Charging

N/A
Yes 15W Fast Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

17h 26m
N/A

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

5h 7m 46s
N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

32 GB
64 GB

Storage Type

eMMC 5.1
eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 512 GB
Yes Up to 2 TB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM
Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G Not Supported 4G
5G Not Supported 4G

VoLTE

Yes
Yes

SIM 1

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

SAR Value

Head: 0.82 W/kg
Head: 0.97 W/kg Body: 0.93 W/kg

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz

Wi-Fi Features

Mobile Hotspot
Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v5.0
Yes v5.2

GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass
Yes with A-GPS Glonass

NFC

No
No

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm
3.5 mm

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

No
Yes

Fingerprint Sensor Position

N/A
Side

Other Sensors

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer