Nokia 3230 vs Micromax Q7

Comparing the Nokia 3230 vs Micromax Q7 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q7 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Nokia 3230 offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax Q7 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax Q7 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Nokia 3230 offers 6 GB, making Micromax Q7 the better option for storage.

Nokia 3230

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Sep, 2004

15 May, 2010

User Ratings

N/A	2.9/5 (28 ratings)

User Feedback

Performance

Chipset

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Resolution

208.00x208 px

320x240 px

Design

Height

109.00 mm

110 mm

Width

49.00 mm

59 mm

Thickness

19.00 mm

10.70 mm

Weight

110 grams

100 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom Smile detection

Video Recording

1280x960

N/A

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

6 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No	Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v1.1

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 MIDI AMR WAV AAC RealAudio

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

200	Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Voice memo T9