|
74%
Nokia 5.3
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
75%
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 5.3 vs Moto G9 Power
Comparing the Nokia 5.3 vs Moto G9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G9 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,408, while Nokia 5.3 scores 1,393, making Moto G9 Power the better performer.
Display: Moto G9 Power offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while Nokia 5.3 offers 6.55 inches, making Moto G9 Power the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 Power feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Nokia 5.3 offers 13 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Nokia 5.3 offers 8 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G9 Power offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Nokia 5.3 offers 4000 mAh, making Moto G9 Power better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 Power equally at 7.
User Rating: Moto G9 Power receives a higher user rating of 4.1, while Nokia 5.3 has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Nokia 5.3
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
15 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(5,208 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(32,482 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
175,385
AnTuTu Score
|
169,608
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
28h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Dec 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
Stock
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
175,385
|
169,608
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 %
|
61.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
450 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.3 %
|
83.31 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
85 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.3 mm
|
172.1 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
221 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
28h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 26m 52s
|
3h 48m 56s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.98 W/kg Body: 1.33 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|