Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 5.3 vs Moto G9
Comparing the Nokia 5.3 vs Moto G9 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G9 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,416, while Nokia 5.3 scores 1,393, making Moto G9 the better performer.
Display: Nokia 5.3 offers a screen size of 6.55 inches, while Moto G9 offers 6.5 inches, making Nokia 5.3 the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Nokia 5.3 offers 13 MP, making Moto G9 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G9 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Nokia 5.3 offers 4000 mAh, making Moto G9 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia 5.3 and Moto G9 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Moto G9 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Nokia 5.3 has a rating of 3.7.
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
31 Aug, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(5,208 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(47,025 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
175,385
AnTuTu Score
|
176,500
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
21h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Aug 31, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
175,385
|
176,500
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
39.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 %
|
22.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
450 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.3 %
|
81.57 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
87 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.3 mm
|
165.2 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
75.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
9.1 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
200 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
21h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 26m 52s
|
2h 5m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.47 W/kg Body: 1.37 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|