|
74%
Nokia 5.3
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
79%
Motorola One Fusion Plus
₹19,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 5.3 vs Motorola One Fusion Plus
Comparing the Nokia 5.3 vs Motorola One Fusion Plus across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Fusion Plus scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,691, while Nokia 5.3 scores 1,393, making Motorola One Fusion Plus the better performer.
Display: Nokia 5.3 offers a screen size of 6.55 inches, while Motorola One Fusion Plus offers 6.5 inches, making Nokia 5.3 the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 5.3 and Motorola One Fusion Plus feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Motorola One Fusion Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Nokia 5.3 offers 13 MP, making Motorola One Fusion Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Motorola One Fusion Plus offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Nokia 5.3 offers 8 MP, making Motorola One Fusion Plus better for front camera photography.
Battery: Motorola One Fusion Plus offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Nokia 5.3 offers 4000 mAh, making Motorola One Fusion Plus better for longer battery life.
Storage: Nokia 5.3 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Fusion Plus offers 128 GB, making Nokia 5.3 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Motorola One Fusion Plus receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Nokia 5.3 is rated 7.
User Rating: Motorola One Fusion Plus receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Nokia 5.3 has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Nokia 5.3
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Motorola One Fusion Plus
₹19,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
24 Jun, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Snapdragon 730G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
18W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(5,208 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(101,701 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
175,385
AnTuTu Score
|
274,684
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
20h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jun 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
175,385
|
274,684
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 %
|
12.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.55 inches (16.64 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
450 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.3 %
|
82.61 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.3 mm
|
162.9 mm
|
Width
|
76.6 mm
|
76.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
210 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/1.7" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 18W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
20h 37m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 26m 52s
|
2h 17m 14s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.52 W/kg Body: 1.43 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|