|
74%
Nokia 5.4
₹16,799
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 5.4 vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the Nokia 5.4 vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,961, while Nokia 5.4 scores 1,451, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Nokia 5.4 offers 6.39 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. Nokia 5.4 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making Nokia 5.4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Nokia 5.4 offers 48 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Nokia 5.4 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 8 MP, making Nokia 5.4 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Nokia 5.4 delivers longer battery life with 18h 53m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making Nokia 5.4 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Nokia 5.4 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Nokia 5.4 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while Nokia 5.4 is rated 6.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.1, while Nokia 5.4 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Nokia 5.4
₹16,799
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
17 Feb, 2021
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 662
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
6.0/10
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(4,738 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(10,782 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
178,545
AnTuTu Score
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
18h 53m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,850
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 17, 2021
(Official)
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
178,545
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
10.0 %
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
70.1 %
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.9 %
|
83.65 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with notch
|
Design
Height
|
160.9 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
180 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 22 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 53m
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 2m 31s
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,850
@ Amazon
|