Nokia 6255 CDMA vs O2 XDA Flame

Comparing the Nokia 6255 CDMA vs O2 XDA Flame across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: O2 XDA Flame offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Nokia 6255 CDMA offers 0.3 MP, making O2 XDA Flame better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Nokia 6255 CDMA offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while O2 XDA Flame offers 2 GB, making Nokia 6255 CDMA the better option for storage.

Nokia 6255 CDMA

(Discontinued)

O2 XDA Flame

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	01 Feb, 2007

Performance

N/A	128 MB RAM

Display

LCD	LCD
160.00x160 px	640.00x 640 pixels, 3.6 inches px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Storage

32 MB

2 GB

User Feedback

Performance

RAM

N/A

128 MB

Display

Display Type

LCD

Resolution

160.00x160 px

640.00x 640 pixels 3.6 inches px

Design

Height

87.30 mm

126.00 mm

Width

47.40 mm

74.00 mm

Thickness

27.00 mm

17.50 mm

Weight

120 grams

119 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Video Recording

640x480

N/A

Battery

TalkTime

Up to 3.25(2G)

Up to 6(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

32 MB

2 GB

Expandable Storage

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No	Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/ACC

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	facilities