Nokia 6265 CDMA vs Motorola MOTOQ

Comparing the Nokia 6265 CDMA vs Motorola MOTOQ across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Nokia 6265 CDMA offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Motorola MOTOQ offers 1.3 MP, making Nokia 6265 CDMA better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Motorola MOTOQ offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Nokia 6265 CDMA offers 24 GB, making Motorola MOTOQ the better option for storage.

Nokia 6265 CDMA

(Discontinued)

Motorola MOTOQ

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	01 Oct, 2008

Display

N/A	LCD
320.00x320 px	240.00x240 pixels ,2 ,4 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Storage

24 MB

64 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Resolution

320.00x320 px

240.00x240 pixels 2 4 px

Design

Height

98.00 mm

116.00 mm

Width

48.00 mm

64.00 mm

Thickness

22.00 mm

11.50 mm

Weight

124 grams

105 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Video Recording

1600x1200

N/A

Battery

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 7(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

24 MB

64 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 1 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v1.2

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 and eAAC+

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 AAC

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

yes

N/A