Nokia 6265 CDMA vs O2 Cocoon

Comparing the Nokia 6265 CDMA vs O2 Cocoon across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Nokia 6265 CDMA and O2 Cocoon feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Nokia 6265 CDMA offers higher internal storage with 24 GB, while O2 Cocoon offers 2 GB, making Nokia 6265 CDMA the better option for storage.

Nokia 6265 CDMA

(Discontinued)

O2 Cocoon

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	01 Jun, 2007

Display

N/A	LCD
320.00x320 px	320.00x 320 pixels, 2.28 inches px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Storage

24 MB

2 GB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Resolution

320.00x320 px

320.00x 320 pixels 2.28 inches px

Design

Height

98.00 mm

94.00 mm

Width

48.00 mm

49.00 mm

Thickness

22.00 mm

21.00 mm

Weight

124 grams

118 grams

Form Factor

N/A

Clamshell

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Video Recording

1600x1200

N/A

Battery

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

24 MB

2 GB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 1 GB

Yes Up to 2 MB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v1.2

Yes v2

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 and eAAC+

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC/AAC+ player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	facilities