O2 XDA Orbit II vs Micromax Q3 ezpad

Comparing the O2 XDA Orbit II vs Micromax Q3 ezpad across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: O2 XDA Orbit II offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 1.3 MP, making O2 XDA Orbit II better for rear camera photography.

Storage: O2 XDA Orbit II offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 10 GB, making O2 XDA Orbit II the better option for storage.

O2 XDA Orbit II

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q3 ezpad

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Feb, 2008

15 Jun, 2009

User Feedback

Performance

RAM

128 MB

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

320.00x 320 pixels 2.8 inches px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

N/A

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

22.38 %

Design

Height

110.00 mm

111.2 mm

Width

58.00 mm

61.2 mm

Thickness

15.50 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

112 grams

97 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

3.2 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Autofocus

Yes

N/A

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Video Recording

640x480
1600x1200

N/A

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 5(2G)

Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

256 MB

10 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/AAC/AAC+/WMA/WAV/AMR-NB player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

facilities

Voice memo T9