|
75%
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM
₹24,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM
Comparing the OPPO F11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F11 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,900, while Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM scores 5,372, making OPPO F11 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO F11 Pro offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM offers 6.4 inches, making OPPO F11 Pro the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO F11 Pro's TFT LTPS, making Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO F11 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM offers 25 MP, making OPPO F11 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while OPPO F11 Pro offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both OPPO F11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM offer the same 4000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both OPPO F11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both OPPO F11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO F11 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
OPPO F11 Pro
₹13,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50 6GB RAM
₹24,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
15 Mar, 2019
|
02 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
TFT LTPS
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
25 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(138,384 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(23,386 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
149,995
AnTuTu Score
|
143,399
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 02, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
149,995
|
143,399
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
12.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
23.3 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
TFT LTPS
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.31 %
|
84.97 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.9 %
|
91.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.3 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
166 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
25 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length CMOS image sensor |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.17 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera13 mm focal length |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.41 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS |
Camera Type
|
Pop-Up
|
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(3G) / Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 23 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 55m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 9m 53s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.323 W/kg Body: 0.922 W/kg
|
Head: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|