|
82%
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
₹34,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F31 Pro Plus vs vivo T5x
Comparing the OPPO F31 Pro Plus vs vivo T5x across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO F31 Pro Plus runs at a higher processing speed of 2.63 GHz, while vivo T5x runs at 2.6 GHz, making OPPO F31 Pro Plus the better performer.
Display: OPPO F31 Pro Plus offers a screen size of 6.79 inches, while vivo T5x offers 6.76 inches, making OPPO F31 Pro Plus the larger display of the two. OPPO F31 Pro Plus features a AMOLED display compared to vivo T5x's LCD, making OPPO F31 Pro Plus the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO F31 Pro Plus and vivo T5x feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both OPPO F31 Pro Plus and vivo T5x feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T5x offers a higher battery capacity with 7200 mAh, while OPPO F31 Pro Plus offers 7000 mAh, making vivo T5x better for longer battery life.
Storage: OPPO F31 Pro Plus offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while vivo T5x offers 128 GB, making OPPO F31 Pro Plus the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO F31 Pro Plus and vivo T5x both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
₹34,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
82%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
19 Sep, 2025
|
17 Mar, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.63 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.79 inches (17.25 cm)
|
6.76 inches (17.17 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
LCD
|
|
1280x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2344 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7000 mAh
|
7200 mAh
|
|
80W Super VOOC Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(724 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(15,219 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
1,077,869
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
13h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 15, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 17, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Year
|
Security Updates
|
3 Years
|
4 Year
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SM7550
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Turbo
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.63 GHz, Single core, Cortex A715 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A715 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A510 |
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 720
|
Mali-G615 MP2
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
1,077,869
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
1,197
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
14.8 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.79 inches (17.25 cm)
|
6.76 inches (17.17 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1280x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2344 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
1600 nits
|
N/A
|
HBM Brightness
|
N/A
|
1200 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
453 ppi
|
382 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
89.23 %
|
85.64 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
93.5 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
163.1 mm
|
166.64 mm
|
Width
|
77.6 mm
|
78.43 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.39 mm
|
Weight
|
204 grams
|
219 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 IP66 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1.5 meter)
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size OV50D 0.61µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0IMX852 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
SuperMoon |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @240 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera24 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
7000 mAh
|
7200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
N/A
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 80W Super VOOC Charging 100% in 61 minutes
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 100% in 91 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 29m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 56m 0s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.160 W/kg Body: 0.988 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 2 (802.11 a)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OPPO F31 Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OPPO K13 Turbo Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OPPO F31
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
realme 15 Pro 5G
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
vivo V70 FE
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
vivo T4
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
vivo T4 Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OnePlus Nord CE 6 5G
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
vivo T5 Pro
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
vivo V60e
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
realme P4 Power
vivo T5x
iQOO Z11x
vivo T5x
vivo T4X
vivo T5x
vivo T4
vivo T5x
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T5x
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
vivo T5x
realme P4
vivo T5x
OnePlus N6 5G
vivo T5x
vivo T4R
vivo T5x
OPPO K13 5G
vivo T5x
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
vivo T5x
realme P4x
vivo T5x
vivo T4 Pro
vivo T5x
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
vivo T5x
vivo Y400
vivo T5x
OPPO K14 5G