|
75%
OPPO F9
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
88%
iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F9 vs iQOO Neo 10R
Comparing the OPPO F9 vs iQOO Neo 10R across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Neo 10R runs at a higher processing speed of 3.0 GHz, while OPPO F9 runs at 2.0 GHz, making iQOO Neo 10R the better performer.
Display: iQOO Neo 10R offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while OPPO F9 offers 6.3 inches, making iQOO Neo 10R the larger display of the two. iQOO Neo 10R features a AMOLED display compared to OPPO F9's IPS LCD, making iQOO Neo 10R the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iQOO Neo 10R offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while OPPO F9 offers 16 MP, making iQOO Neo 10R better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: iQOO Neo 10R offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO F9 offers 16 MP, making iQOO Neo 10R better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Neo 10R offers a higher battery capacity with 6400 mAh, while OPPO F9 offers 3500 mAh, making iQOO Neo 10R better for longer battery life.
Storage: OPPO F9 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while iQOO Neo 10R offers 128 GB, making OPPO F9 the better option for storage.
User Rating: OPPO F9 and iQOO Neo 10R both receive the same user rating of 4.5.
|
✕
OPPO F9
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
iQOO Neo 10R
₹23,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
88%
|
Release Date
|
15 Sep, 2018
|
11 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P60
|
Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
|
Fast Charging
|
80W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.1/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(41,146 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(7,527 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
1,476,651
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
16h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 11, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
4 Years
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P60
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
3 GHz, Single core, Cortex X4 2.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A720 2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A520 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 735
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Cooling Technology
|
N/A
|
Vapor Chamber
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
1,476,651
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
18.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.1 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
PWM Dimming
|
N/A
|
3840 Hz
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
453 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.84 %
|
89.34 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.8 %
|
93.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.7 mm
|
163.72 mm
|
Width
|
74 mm
|
75.88 mm
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
7.98 mm
|
Weight
|
169 grams
|
196 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP65
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/1.83.62 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) SuperMoon |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @60 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.56 mm focal length Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
Wide Angle Selfie
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
4k @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
6400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Fast Charging
|
Yes 80W Flash Charging 50% in 26 minutes
|
Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 7.5W Reverse Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
16h 22m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
43m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.97 W/kg Body: 0.96 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz 6GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|