|
80%
OPPO Reno3 Pro
₹18,990
(Out of Stock)
|
83%
OnePlus 7T Pro
₹52,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO Reno3 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro
Comparing the OPPO Reno3 Pro vs OnePlus 7T Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OnePlus 7T Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,667, while OPPO Reno3 Pro scores 1,514, making OnePlus 7T Pro the better performer.
Display: OnePlus 7T Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while OPPO Reno3 Pro offers 6.4 inches, making OnePlus 7T Pro the larger display of the two. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a Super AMOLED display compared to OnePlus 7T Pro's Fluid AMOLED, making OPPO Reno3 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO Reno3 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while OnePlus 7T Pro offers 48 MP, making OPPO Reno3 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO Reno3 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 44 MP, while OnePlus 7T Pro offers 16 MP, making OPPO Reno3 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO Reno3 Pro delivers longer battery life with 12h 27m, while OnePlus 7T Pro delivers 6h 44m, making OPPO Reno3 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: OnePlus 7T Pro offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while OPPO Reno3 Pro offers 128 GB, making OnePlus 7T Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: OnePlus 7T Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO Reno3 Pro is rated 7.
User Rating: OPPO Reno3 Pro and OnePlus 7T Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO Reno3 Pro
₹18,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OnePlus 7T Pro
₹52,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
83%
|
Release Date
|
06 Mar, 2020
|
11 Oct, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P95
|
Snapdragon 855 Plus
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.96 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
| Helio P95 vs Snapdragon 855 Plus | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Fluid AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1440x3120 px (QHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
13 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
16 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 3x Optical Zoom)
|
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
44 MP + 2 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4025 mAh
|
4085 mAh
|
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
30W Warp Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.0
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(6,083 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(4,586 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
224,603
AnTuTu Score
|
483,785
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
6h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 06, 2020
(Official)
|
Oct 11, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
OS Updates
|
2 Year
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
4 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Oxygen OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P95
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.96 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GM9446
|
Adreno 640
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
224,603
|
483,785
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
17.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
6.7 %
|
29.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED (Curved Display)
|
Fluid AMOLED (Curved Display)
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1440x3120 px (QHD+)
|
Brightness
|
800 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
411 ppi
|
515 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.84 %
|
88.3 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.5 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
158.8 mm
|
162.6 mm
|
Width
|
73.4 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
175 grams
|
206 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.61/2.25" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/3.4" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera17 mm focal length |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera78 mm focal length 1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Contrast Detection Autofocus Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Continuous Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @240 fps HD @480 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
44 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.6" sensor size 0.7µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4025 mAh
|
4085 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 27 Hours(3G) / Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0 50% in 20 minutes
|
Yes 30W Warp Charging 68% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 27m
|
6h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
47m 21s
|
54m 10s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 700(band 29) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) / 700(band 29) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.18 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Head: 1.07 W/kg Body: 0.72 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|