|
69%
POCO C3 64GB
₹12,990
|
70%
Moto E7 Power 64GB
₹11,990
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C3 64GB vs Moto E7 Power 64GB
Comparing the POCO C3 64GB vs Moto E7 Power 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto E7 Power 64GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 879, while POCO C3 64GB scores 523, making Moto E7 Power 64GB the better performer.
Display: POCO C3 64GB offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Moto E7 Power 64GB offers 6.5 inches, making POCO C3 64GB the larger display of the two. Both POCO C3 64GB and Moto E7 Power 64GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO C3 64GB and Moto E7 Power 64GB feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both POCO C3 64GB and Moto E7 Power 64GB feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto E7 Power 64GB delivers longer battery life with 19h 00m, while POCO C3 64GB delivers 18h 46m, making Moto E7 Power 64GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO C3 64GB and Moto E7 Power 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both POCO C3 64GB and Moto E7 Power 64GB equally at 7.
User Rating: POCO C3 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto E7 Power 64GB has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
POCO C3 64GB
₹12,990
@ Flipkart
|
✕
Moto E7 Power 64GB
₹11,990
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
70%
|
Release Date
|
16 Oct, 2020
|
19 Feb, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G35
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(309,618 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(85,357 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
18h 46m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
104,632
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,990
|
₹11,990
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 16, 2020
(Official)
|
Feb 19, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G35
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
2 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
104,632
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
37.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
2.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.3 %
|
31.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
380 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.08 %
|
81.56 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
85 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
165 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.2 mm
|
Weight
|
194 grams
|
200 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.41.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 37 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 46m
|
19h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 45m 1s
|
2h 37m 21s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.506 W/kg Body: 0.833 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,990
|
₹11,990
|