|
73%
POCO C55
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Infinix Note 12i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C55 vs Infinix Note 12i
Comparing the POCO C55 vs Infinix Note 12i across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Infinix Note 12i scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,418, while POCO C55 scores 1,279, making Infinix Note 12i the better performer.
Display: POCO C55 offers a screen size of 6.71 inches, while Infinix Note 12i offers 6.7 inches, making POCO C55 the larger display of the two. Infinix Note 12i features a AMOLED display compared to POCO C55's IPS LCD, making Infinix Note 12i the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both POCO C55 and Infinix Note 12i feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Infinix Note 12i offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while POCO C55 offers 5 MP, making Infinix Note 12i better for front camera photography.
Battery: POCO C55 delivers longer battery life with 14h 43m, while Infinix Note 12i delivers 10h 33m, making POCO C55 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO C55 and Infinix Note 12i offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: POCO C55 and Infinix Note 12i both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO C55
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Infinix Note 12i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
28 Feb, 2023
|
30 Jan, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(127,579 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(16,956 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
14h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 33m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
204,484
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 28, 2023
(Official)
|
Jan 30, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
XOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
204,484
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
33.1 %
|
37.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.08 %
|
85.91 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
92 %
|
Design
Height
|
168.7 mm
|
164.47 mm
|
Width
|
76.4 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
7.8 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.81.28µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
2k @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
2k @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 29.5 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 90 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 43m
|
10h 33m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 11m 8s
|
1h 26m 5s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.769 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|