Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C55 vs Moto G32
Comparing the POCO C55 vs Moto G32 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G32 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,582, while POCO C55 scores 1,279, making Moto G32 the better performer.
Display: POCO C55 offers a screen size of 6.71 inches, while Moto G32 offers 6.5 inches, making POCO C55 the larger display of the two. Both POCO C55 and Moto G32 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO C55 and Moto G32 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G32 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while POCO C55 offers 5 MP, making Moto G32 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G32 delivers longer battery life with 19h 40m, while POCO C55 delivers 14h 43m, making Moto G32 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO C55 and Moto G32 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: POCO C55 and Moto G32 both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
POCO C55
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Moto G32
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
28 Feb, 2023
|
09 Aug, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
33W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(127,579 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(45,976 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
14h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 40m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
245,680
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 28, 2023
(Official)
|
Aug 09, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
1 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
245,680
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
33.1 %
|
44.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.71 inches (17.04 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1650 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
268 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.08 %
|
85.48 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
89.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
168.7 mm
|
161.7 mm
|
Width
|
76.4 mm
|
73.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
184 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.81.28µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
|
Dual Video Recording
Macro Video |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 33W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 43m
|
19h 40m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 11m 8s
|
2h 8m 58s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.769 W/kg
|
Head: 0.84 W/kg Body: 1.07 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹16,999
|