Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO C71 vs vivo T4X
Comparing the POCO C71 vs vivo T4X across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo T4X scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,827, while POCO C71 scores 1,481, making vivo T4X the better performer.
Display: POCO C71 offers a screen size of 6.88 inches, while vivo T4X offers 6.72 inches, making POCO C71 the larger display of the two. POCO C71 features a IPS LCD display compared to vivo T4X's LCD, making POCO C71 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: vivo T4X offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while POCO C71 offers 32 MP, making vivo T4X better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO C71 and vivo T4X feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T4X delivers longer battery life with 14h 11m, while POCO C71 delivers 13h 41m, making vivo T4X the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO C71 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo T4X offers 128 GB, making POCO C71 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo T4X receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while POCO C71 is rated 7.5.
User Rating: vivo T4X receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while POCO C71 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
vivo T4X
₹16,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
82%
|
Release Date
|
08 Apr, 2025
|
12 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Unisoc T7250
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5200 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
44W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(62,770 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(177,914 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
265,154
AnTuTu Score
|
685,052
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 41m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,490
|
₹16,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 08, 2025
(Official)
|
Mar 12, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
2 Years
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
4 Years
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Unisoc T7250
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
265,154
|
685,052
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
40.2 %
|
24.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.88 inches (17.48 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
600 nits
|
1050 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
600 nits
|
1050 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
260 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.23 %
|
86.24 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
171.79 mm
|
165.70 mm
|
Width
|
77.8 mm
|
76.30 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.26 mm
|
8.09 mm
|
Weight
|
193 grams
|
204 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Filters Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.05 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
5200 mAh
|
6500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 41m
|
14h 11m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 0m 0s
|
1h 7m 40s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.818 W/kg Body: 0.770 W/kg
|
Head: 0.985 W/kg Body: 0.936 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,490
|
₹16,999
|
Related Comparisons
POCO C71
Xiaomi Redmi A5
POCO C71
realme C71
POCO C71
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
POCO C71
Itel Zeno 100
vivo T4X
realme P3
vivo T4X
vivo T5x
vivo T4X
iQOO Z10x
vivo T4X
realme P4x
vivo T4X
POCO M7 Pro
vivo T4X
vivo Y31 5G
vivo T4X
OPPO K13 5G
vivo T4X
vivo T4
vivo T4X
Moto G86 Power
vivo T4X
OPPO K14x 5G
vivo T4X
vivo T5 Lite 5G
vivo T4X
vivo T4 Lite
vivo T4X
iQOO Z11 5G
vivo T4X
vivo Y21 5G
vivo T4X
Moto G57 Power