|
77%
POCO F1 256GB
₹19,490
(Out of Stock)
|
80%
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F1 256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB
Comparing the POCO F1 256GB vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,792, while POCO F1 256GB scores 9,103, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB offers a screen size of 6.39 inches, while POCO F1 256GB offers 6.18 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB features a AMOLED display compared to POCO F1 256GB's IPS LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while POCO F1 256GB offers 12 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO F1 256GB and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB feature a 20 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both POCO F1 256GB and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB offer the same 4000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both POCO F1 256GB and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB offer the same internal storage of 256 GB.
User Rating: POCO F1 256GB and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB both receive the same user rating of 4.5.
|
✕
POCO F1 256GB
₹19,490
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 256GB
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
29 Aug, 2018
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 845
|
Snapdragon 855
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.84 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
27W Quick Charging
|
Storage
|
256 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(41,352 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(22,040 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
267,207
AnTuTu Score
|
373,945
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
13h 45m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 29, 2018
(Official)
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 |
Octa core
2.84 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 630
|
Adreno 640
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
267,207
|
373,945
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18.7:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.2 %
|
85.9 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
155.5 mm
|
156.7 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
74.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.55" sensor size IMX363 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @240 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 0.9µm pixel size |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 27W Quick Charging v4.0 58% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
13h 45m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 12m 46s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.719 W/kg Body: 0.746 W/kg
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.72 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|