|
76%
POCO F1
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
80%
Nubia Red Magic 3S
₹39,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F1 vs Nubia Red Magic 3S
Comparing the POCO F1 vs Nubia Red Magic 3S across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO F1 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 9,103, while Nubia Red Magic 3S scores 2,542, making POCO F1 the better performer.
Display: Nubia Red Magic 3S offers a screen size of 6.65 inches, while POCO F1 offers 6.18 inches, making Nubia Red Magic 3S the larger display of the two. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a AMOLED display compared to POCO F1's IPS LCD, making Nubia Red Magic 3S the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Nubia Red Magic 3S offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while POCO F1 offers 12 MP, making Nubia Red Magic 3S better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: POCO F1 offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while Nubia Red Magic 3S offers 16 MP, making POCO F1 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Nubia Red Magic 3S offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while POCO F1 offers 4000 mAh, making Nubia Red Magic 3S better for longer battery life.
Storage: POCO F1 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Nubia Red Magic 3S offers 128 GB, making POCO F1 the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO F1 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Nubia Red Magic 3S has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO F1
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Nubia Red Magic 3S
₹39,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
80%
|
Release Date
|
29 Aug, 2018
|
17 Oct, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 845
|
Snapdragon 855 Plus
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.96 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.65 inches (16.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Quick Charging
|
27W Quick Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(244,312 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(214 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
267,207
AnTuTu Score
|
484,670
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 29, 2018
(Official)
|
Oct 17, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 |
Octa core
2.96 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 630
|
Adreno 640
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
267,207
|
484,670
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
13.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.65 inches (16.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18.7:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
388 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.2 %
|
80.37 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
155.5 mm
|
171.7 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
78.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
215 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.55" sensor size IMX363 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.751/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @240 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 0.9µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 27W Quick Charging v4.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 50m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 33m 34s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.719 W/kg Body: 0.746 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|