|
76%
POCO F1
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
84%
POCO F4 5G
₹27,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F1 vs POCO F4 5G
Comparing the POCO F1 vs POCO F4 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO F1 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 9,103, while POCO F4 5G scores 3,384, making POCO F1 the better performer.
Display: POCO F4 5G offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while POCO F1 offers 6.18 inches, making POCO F4 5G the larger display of the two. POCO F4 5G features a AMOLED display compared to POCO F1's IPS LCD, making POCO F4 5G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO F4 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while POCO F1 offers 12 MP, making POCO F4 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO F1 and POCO F4 5G feature a 20 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO F4 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 4500 mAh, while POCO F1 offers 4000 mAh, making POCO F4 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: POCO F1 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while POCO F4 5G offers 128 GB, making POCO F1 the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO F1 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while POCO F4 5G has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
POCO F1
₹21,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO F4 5G
₹27,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
84%
|
Release Date
|
29 Aug, 2018
|
27 Jun, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 845
|
Snapdragon 870
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
|
20 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
18W Quick Charging
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(244,312 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(13,770 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
267,207
AnTuTu Score
|
735,714
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
13h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 29, 2018
(Official)
|
Jun 27, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 385 |
Octa core
3.2 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 630
|
Adreno 650
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5
|
Cooling Technology
|
N/A
|
Liquid Cooling
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
267,207
|
735,714
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
18.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.18 inches (15.7 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2246 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1300 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
360 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
18.7:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.2 %
|
86.71 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Design
Height
|
155.5 mm
|
163.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.55" sensor size IMX363 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.4µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleOVB64B 0.7µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.0 Depth Camera1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Dual Pixel Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps HD @240 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Movie Frame Vlog Mode Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 0.9µm pixel size |
20 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size Exmor RS 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 30 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
13h 22m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
37m 13s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.719 W/kg Body: 0.746 W/kg
|
Head: 0.840 W/kg Body: 0.812 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|