|
81%
POCO F3 GT
₹26,999
(Out of Stock)
|
84%
POCO F4 5G
₹27,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F3 GT vs POCO F4 5G
Comparing the POCO F3 GT vs POCO F4 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO F4 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,384, while POCO F3 GT scores 2,430, making POCO F4 5G the better performer.
Display: Both POCO F3 GT and POCO F4 5G offer the same screen size of 6.67 inches and feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO F3 GT and POCO F4 5G feature a 64 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: POCO F4 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while POCO F3 GT offers 16 MP, making POCO F4 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: POCO F3 GT delivers longer battery life with 17h 47m, while POCO F4 5G delivers 13h 22m, making POCO F3 GT the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO F3 GT and POCO F4 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: POCO F4 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while POCO F3 GT is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO F3 GT and POCO F4 5G both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
POCO F3 GT
₹26,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
POCO F4 5G
₹27,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
81%
|
84%
|
Release Date
|
24 Jul, 2021
|
27 Jun, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
|
Snapdragon 870
|
|
Octa Core (upto 3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 3.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
| Dimensity 1200 vs Snapdragon 870 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
20 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5065 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(4,805 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(13,770 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
538,911
AnTuTu Score
|
735,714
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 47m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 24, 2021
(Official)
|
Jun 27, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
3 GHz, Single core, Cortex A78 2.6 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
3.2 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G77 MC9
|
Adreno 650
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5
|
Cooling Technology
|
N/A
|
Liquid Cooling
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
538,911
|
735,714
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
18.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
10.2 %
|
18.2 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1300 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
480 Hz
|
360 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.27 %
|
86.71 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Design
Height
|
161.9 mm
|
163.2 mm
|
Width
|
76.9 mm
|
75.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
205 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.65 Wide Angle1.4µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleOVB64B 0.7µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Movie Frame Vlog Mode Short Video Mode |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
20 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size Exmor RS 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5065 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging v3.0 100% in 42 minutes
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 47m
|
13h 22m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
52m 57s
|
37m 13s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: TDD N77 / N78
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.815 W/kg Body: 0.485 W/kg
|
Head: 0.840 W/kg Body: 0.812 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|