|
84%
POCO F4 5G
₹15,730
(Out of Stock)
|
81%
iQOO Z6 Pro
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO F4 5G vs iQOO Z6 Pro
Comparing the POCO F4 5G vs iQOO Z6 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO F4 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,384, while iQOO Z6 Pro scores 2,912, making POCO F4 5G the better performer.
Display: POCO F4 5G offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while iQOO Z6 Pro offers 6.44 inches, making POCO F4 5G the larger display of the two. Both POCO F4 5G and iQOO Z6 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both POCO F4 5G and iQOO Z6 Pro feature a 64 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: POCO F4 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 20 MP, while iQOO Z6 Pro offers 16 MP, making POCO F4 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Z6 Pro delivers longer battery life with 17h 16m, while POCO F4 5G delivers 13h 22m, making iQOO Z6 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both POCO F4 5G and iQOO Z6 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: POCO F4 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while iQOO Z6 Pro is rated 7.
User Rating: POCO F4 5G and iQOO Z6 Pro both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
POCO F4 5G
₹15,730
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
iQOO Z6 Pro
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
84%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jun, 2022
|
05 May, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 870
|
Snapdragon 778G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 3.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2404 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
20 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4700 mAh
|
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
66W Flash Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(13,770 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(12,633 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
735,714
AnTuTu Score
|
550,719
AnTuTu Score
|
|
13h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
17h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 27, 2022
(Official)
|
May 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
3.2 GHz, Single core, Kryo 585 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 585 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 585 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Single core, Kryo 670 2.2 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 670 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 670 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 650
|
Adreno 642L
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 12 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB / 12 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR5
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
735,714
|
550,719
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
18.2 %
|
25.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2404 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1300 nits
|
1300 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.71 %
|
85.19 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.01 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.2 mm
|
159.7 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
73.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
195 grams
|
180 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleOVB64B 0.7µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Movie Frame Vlog Mode Short Video Mode |
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
20 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size Exmor RS 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Yes 66W Flash Charging 50% in 18 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 22m
|
17h 16m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 37m 13s
|
0h 51m 26s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8
TDD N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.840 W/kg Body: 0.812 W/kg
|
Head: 1.15 W/kg Body: 0.56 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|