POCO M3 vs Lenovo K12 Pro

Share  

Comparing the POCO M3 vs Lenovo K12 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Both POCO M3 and Lenovo K12 Pro run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.


Display: Lenovo K12 Pro offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while POCO M3 offers 6.53 inches, making Lenovo K12 Pro the larger display of the two. Both POCO M3 and Lenovo K12 Pro feature the same IPS LCD display.


Rear Camera: Lenovo K12 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while POCO M3 offers 48 MP, making Lenovo K12 Pro better for rear camera photography.


Front Camera: Lenovo K12 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while POCO M3 offers 8 MP, making Lenovo K12 Pro better for front camera photography.


Battery: Both POCO M3 and Lenovo K12 Pro offer the same 6000 mAh battery capacity.


Storage: Both POCO M3 and Lenovo K12 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.

...read more
POCO M3
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
Lenovo K12 Pro
₹11,599
(Not Released in India)
Add to Compare

Summary

Spec Score

75%
74%

Release Date

03 Feb, 2021
25 Oct, 2021

Performance

Snapdragon 662
Snapdragon 662
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
6 GB RAM
4 GB RAM

Display

6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
720x1640 px (HD+)
60 Hz Refresh Rate
N/A

Rear Camera

48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
2 MP
Depth Camera
2 MP
Depth Camera
2 MP
Macro Camera
2 MP
Macro Camera

Front Camera

8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
16 MP

Battery

6000 mAh
6000 mAh
18W Fast Charging
20W Fast Charging
No Wireless Charging
N/A

Storage

64 GB
64 GB
UFS 2.1
N/A

Expert Review

8.0/10
N/A

Pros

  • One-of-a-kind design
  • Capable stereo speakers
  • Excellent battery life
  • Device yet to be reviewed

Cons

  • Cameras could have been better
  • Gaming performance isn't a strong suite
  • Device yet to be reviewed

User Ratings

4.3/5
(488,136 ratings)
N/A

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

178,246
AnTuTu Score
N/A
20h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
N/A

Video

Videos
4 More Videos
There are no videos available for the device.

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Feb 03, 2021
(Official)
N/A

Operating System

Android v10 (Q)
Android v10 (Q)

Custom UI

MIUI
N/A

Performance

Performance Rating

Good
Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Processor

Octa core

2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260
Octa core

2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit
64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

11 nm
11 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 610
Adreno 610

RAM

4 GB / 6 GB
4 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR4X
N/A

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

178,246
N/A

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

24.0 s
N/A

Gaming Test Results

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

6.0 %
N/A

Heating* (The lower, the better)

59.9 %
N/A
* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent
Excellent

Display Type

IPS LCD
IPS LCD

Screen Size

6.53 inches  (16.59 cm)
6.8 inches  (17.27 cm)

Resolution

1080x2340 px (FHD+)
720x1640 px (HD+)

Brightness

400 nits
N/A

Refresh Rate

60 Hz
N/A

Aspect Ratio

19.5:9
20.5:9

Pixel Density

395 ppi
263 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

83.25 %
83.2 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass v3
N/A

Bezel-less Display

Yes with waterdrop notch
Yes with punch-hole display

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

90.34 %
N/A

Design

Height

162.3 mm
172.1 mm

Width

77.3 mm
76.8 mm

Thickness

9.6 mm
9.7 mm

Weight

197 grams
221 grams

Build Material

Back: Plastic
Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof
Yes Splash proof

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good
Very Good

Capacity

6000 mAh
6000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-Polymer
Li-Polymer

Quick Charging

Yes 18W Fast Charging
Yes 20W Fast Charging

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

20h 44m
N/A

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

2h 18m 51s
N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

64 GB / 128 GB
64 GB

Storage Type

UFS 2.1
N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 512 GB
Yes Up to 512 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM
Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)

Network Support

5G Not Supported 4G
5G Not Supported 4G

VoLTE

Yes
Yes

SIM 1

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26)

SIM 2

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26)

SAR Value

Head: 0.868 W/kg Body: 0.865 W/kg
N/A

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz

Wi-Fi Features

Mobile Hotspot
Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v5.0
Yes v5.0

GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass
Yes with A-GPS

NFC

No
Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm
3.5 mm

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

Yes
Yes

Fingerprint Sensor Position

Side
Rear

Other Sensors

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer