|
78%
POCO X4 Pro
₹19,499
|
78%
Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO X4 Pro vs Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G
Comparing the POCO X4 Pro vs Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO X4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,988, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G scores 1,789, making POCO X4 Pro the better performer.
Display: Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while POCO X4 Pro offers 6.67 inches, making Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both POCO X4 Pro and Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while POCO X4 Pro offers 64 MP, making Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO X4 Pro and Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: POCO X4 Pro delivers longer battery life with 16h 56m, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G delivers 11h 57m, making POCO X4 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO X4 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G offers 256 GB, making POCO X4 Pro the better option for storage.
User Rating: POCO X4 Pro and Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO X4 Pro
₹19,499
@ Amazon
|
✕
Infinix Note 12 Pro 4G
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
05 Apr, 2022
|
01 Sep, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 695
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.4/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(94,011 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(6,525 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
393,322
AnTuTu Score
|
380,698
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
11h 57m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹19,499
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Sep 01, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
XOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
393,322
|
380,698
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
29.9 %
|
38.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1200 nits
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.01 %
|
86.23 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
92 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.1 mm
|
164.3 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
76.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
7.8 mm
|
Weight
|
205 grams
|
192 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KGW3 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
108 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/1.67" sensor size S5KHM6 ISO-CELL |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
2k @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Short Video Mode |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 41 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 90 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 56m
|
11h 57m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 42m 47s
|
1h 35m 27s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.861 W/kg Body: 0.583 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹19,499
|
Not Available in any store
|