|
79%
POCO X5
₹13,499
(Out of Stock)
|
81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition
₹20,290
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO X5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition
Comparing the POCO X5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while POCO X5 runs at 2.2 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition the better performer.
Display: Both POCO X5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition offer the same screen size of 6.67 inches, but POCO X5 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition's OLED, making POCO X5 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while POCO X5 offers 48 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while POCO X5 offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both POCO X5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both POCO X5 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
|
✕
POCO X5
₹13,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Speed Edition
₹20,290
(Not Released in India)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
21 Mar, 2023
|
26 Jun, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 695
|
Snapdragon 778G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
OLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
67W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(39,358 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
16h 06m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 21, 2023
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v13
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Single core, Cortex A78 2.2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A78 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Adreno 642L
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
12.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
OLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1200 nits
|
900 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
85.02 %
|
86.76 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Design
Height
|
165.8 mm
|
162.9 mm
|
Width
|
76.2 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
181 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
108 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.89 Wide Angle1/1.52" sensor size S5KHM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Beautify |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Filters Touch to focus Voice Shutter |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
Macro Video Kaleidoscope |
Slow Motion
Movie Frame Vlog Mode Kaleidoscope |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Yes 67W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 06m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 3m 8s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.842 W/kg Body: 0.682 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|