|
61%
Panasonic Eluga Arc
₹8,097
(Discontinued)
|
Panasonic Eluga Tapp
₹6,500
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Panasonic Eluga Arc vs Panasonic Eluga Tapp
Comparing the Panasonic Eluga Arc vs Panasonic Eluga Tapp across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Panasonic Eluga Tapp runs at a higher processing speed of 1.25 GHz, while Panasonic Eluga Arc runs at 1.2 GHz, making Panasonic Eluga Tapp the better performer.
Display: Panasonic Eluga Tapp offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Panasonic Eluga Arc offers 4.7 inches, making Panasonic Eluga Tapp the larger display of the two. Both Panasonic Eluga Arc and Panasonic Eluga Tapp feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Panasonic Eluga Arc and Panasonic Eluga Tapp feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Panasonic Eluga Arc and Panasonic Eluga Tapp feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Panasonic Eluga Tapp offers a higher battery capacity with 2800 mAh, while Panasonic Eluga Arc offers 1800 mAh, making Panasonic Eluga Tapp better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Panasonic Eluga Arc and Panasonic Eluga Tapp offer the same internal storage of 16 GB.
User Rating: Panasonic Eluga Arc receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Panasonic Eluga Tapp has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Panasonic Eluga Arc
₹8,097
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Panasonic Eluga Tapp
₹6,500
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
61%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
07 Apr, 2016
|
14 Nov, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 410
|
MediaTek
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.25 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1800 mAh
|
2800 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(300 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(2,815 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Nov 14, 2016
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
|
MediaTek
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 1.25 GHz
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 306
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
312 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.24 %
|
67.72 %
|
Design
Height
|
139 mm
|
143 mm
|
Width
|
67 mm
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
130 grams
|
138 grams
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
2800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v1.0
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Back
|
Front
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|