Philips 160 vs Karbonn KT 52

Share  

Comparing the Philips 160 vs Karbonn KT 52 across battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Battery: Philips 160 offers a higher battery capacity with 720 mAh, while Karbonn KT 52 offers 1100 mAh, making Philips 160 better for longer battery life.

...read more
Philips 160
(Discontinued)
Karbonn KT 52
₹1,690
(Out of Stock)
Add to Compare

Summary

Release Date

25 Sep, 2005
N/A

Display

N/A
2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
N/A
LCD
101x80 px
240x320 px

Rear Camera

N/A
1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Battery

720 mAh
1100 mAh

Storage

4 MB
N/A

User Ratings

N/A
3.3/5
(81 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A
LCD

Screen Size

N/A
2.4 inches  (6.1 cm)

Resolution

101x80 px
240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A
167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A
35.53 %

Design

Height

103 mm
98.5 mm

Width

47.5 mm
51 mm

Thickness

18.70 mm
12.90 mm

Weight

84 grams
N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

N/A
1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A
Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A
Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

N/A
Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

720 mAh
1100 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)
N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

4 MB
N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes
Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM
Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported
5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No
No

Bluetooth

No
Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No
Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Loud Speaker and 3.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Games

2 Games
N/A

Java

No
No

Browser

Yes
Yes

Phone Book

Yes
Yes 500 Entries Phonebook Backup and Restore

SMS

Yes
Yes SMS Storage 100

MMS

N/A
Yes

Other Facilities

T9 Dust-proof keypad Calculator Euro Converter
N/A