Philips 160
|
Karbonn KT 52
₹1,690
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Philips 160 vs Karbonn KT 52
Share
Comparing the Philips 160 vs Karbonn KT 52 across battery to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Battery: Philips 160 offers a higher battery capacity with 720 mAh, while Karbonn KT 52 offers 1100 mAh, making Philips 160 better for longer battery life.
|
Philips 160
|
Karbonn KT 52
₹1,690
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
25 Sep, 2005
|
N/A
|
Display
|
N/A
|
2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
|
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
|
101x80 px
|
240x320 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
Battery
|
720 mAh
|
1100 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 MB
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.3/5
(81 ratings)
|
User Feedback
Display
Display Type
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
N/A
|
2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
|
Resolution
|
101x80 px
|
240x320 px
|
Pixel Density
|
N/A
|
167 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
35.53 %
|
Design
Height
|
103 mm
|
98.5 mm
|
Width
|
47.5 mm
|
51 mm
|
Thickness
|
18.70 mm
|
12.90 mm
|
Weight
|
84 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Battery
Capacity
|
720 mAh
|
1100 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 6(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 MB
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes Up to 8 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
No
|
No
|
Bluetooth
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Music
|
Yes Music Formats: No
|
Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with Loud Speaker and 3.5mm Audio Jack
|
Sensors
Games
|
2 Games
|
N/A
|
Java
|
No
|
No
|
Browser
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Phone Book
|
Yes
|
Yes 500 Entries Phonebook Backup and Restore
|
SMS
|
Yes
|
Yes SMS Storage 100
|
MMS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Other Facilities
|
T9 Dust-proof keypad Calculator Euro Converter
|
N/A
|