Philips 392 vs Micromax Q7

Comparing the Philips 392 vs Micromax Q7 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q7 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Philips 392 offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax Q7 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax Q7 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Philips 392 offers 11 GB, making Micromax Q7 the better option for storage.

Philips 392

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2008

15 May, 2010

Display

LCD	N/A
320.00x 320 pixels , 2.4 inches px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

800 mAh

Storage

11 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	2.9/5 (28 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Resolution

320.00x 320 pixels 2.4 inches px

320x240 px

Design

Height

105.00 mm

110 mm

Width

47.00 mm

59 mm

Thickness

13.80 mm

10.70 mm

Weight

83 grams

100 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

220x176 @ 12.5

N/A

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 5(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

11 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No	Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/MPEG4 player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Sensors

Java

No	Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Facilities

Voice memo T9