Philips 399 vs Micromax E390

Comparing the Philips 399 vs Micromax E390 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Both Philips 399 and Micromax E390 feature a 1.3 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: Micromax E390 offers higher internal storage with 19 GB, while Philips 399 offers 11 GB, making Micromax E390 the better option for storage.

Philips 399

(Discontinued)

Micromax E390

₹4,199

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jun, 2007

13 Feb, 2012

User Ratings

N/A	2.7/5 (101 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

TFT

Screen Size

N/A	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

320.00x 320 pixels 2.6 inches px

240x400 px

Pixel Density

N/A

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

45 %

Display Colour

N/A

262k

Design

Height

102.00 mm

98.1 mm

Width

49.00 mm

50.5 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

15.30 mm

Weight

80 grams

83.7 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

N/A	1280 x 1024 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Video Recording

220x176 @ 15

N/A

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Up to 5 Hours(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

11 MB

19.9 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: 3GP MPEG4

Ring Tone

N/A	Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3/MPEG4 player

Yes Music Formats: AMR MIDI MP3

Sensors

Games

N/A

Yes

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Yes WAP

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 2000 Entries Limited

SMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Facilities

N/A