Philips Xenium 9@9g vs Micromax Q7

Comparing the Philips Xenium 9@9g vs Micromax Q7 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q7 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Philips Xenium 9@9g offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax Q7 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax Q7 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Philips Xenium 9@9g offers 18 GB, making Micromax Q7 the better option for storage.

Philips Xenium 9@9g

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2007

15 May, 2010

Display

OLED	N/A
160.00x 160 pixels , 1.8 inches , 29 X 36 mm px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

800 mAh

Storage

18 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	2.9/5 (28 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

OLED

N/A

Resolution

160.00x 160 pixels 1.8 inches 29 X 36 mm px

320x240 px

Design

Height

105.60 mm

110 mm

Width

46.00 mm

59 mm

Thickness

15.00 mm

10.70 mm

Weight

86 grams

100 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

800 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 8.5(2G)

Up to 4.5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

18 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

No	Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

Bluetooth

Yes v1.1

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

N/A

3.5 mm

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes 1000 Entries

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Facilities

Voice memo T9