Philips Xenium W736 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Philips Xenium W736 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Philips Xenium W736 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Both Philips Xenium W736 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Philips Xenium W736 features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Philips Xenium W736 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Philips Xenium W736 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Philips Xenium W736 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Philips Xenium W736 offers a higher battery capacity with 2400 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Philips Xenium W736 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Philips Xenium W736 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Philips Xenium W736
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
