Philips Xenium X320 vs Micromax X320

Comparing the Philips Xenium X320 vs Micromax X320 across camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Philips Xenium X320 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Micromax X320 offers 0.3 MP, making Philips Xenium X320 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Micromax X320 offers a higher battery capacity with 1450 mAh, while Philips Xenium X320 offers 1050 mAh, making Micromax X320 better for longer battery life.

Philips Xenium X320

(Discontinued)

Micromax X320

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Dec, 2009

07 Sep, 2012

User Ratings

N/A	2.6/5 (5 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

N/A

Resolution

240x320 px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

182 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

29 %

N/A

Design

Height

111 mm

120 mm

Width

46.6 mm

64 mm

Thickness

14.15 mm

10.50 mm

Weight

100 grams

95 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Video Recording

220x176 @ 15

N/A

Battery

Capacity

1050 mAh

1450 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 8.5(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

5 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 2 GB

Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes v2

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: H.263

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : AMR MP3 AAC WAV MIDI

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

1000 entries Photocall

Yes

SMS

threaded view

Yes

Other Facilities

Screensavers and wallpapers Voice Memo Organizer T9

N/A