|
52%
Plum Flix
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Plum Flix vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Plum Flix vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Plum Flix runs at 0.8 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Plum Flix offers 3.2 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. Plum Flix features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Plum Flix the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Plum Flix offers 3.2 MP, making Lava Iris 406q better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Plum Flix and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Plum Flix offers 1200 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Plum Flix offers 256 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
|
Plum Flix
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 May, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6573
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 800 MHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
256 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6573
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
800 MHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
180 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
49.53 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
108 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
57 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
14.50 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
90 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 4(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
Document Viewer Google Search Maps Gmail YouTube Calendar Google Talk Picasa integration
|
N/A
|