|
52%
Plum Flix
|
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312
₹7,340
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Plum Flix vs Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312
Comparing the Plum Flix vs Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 runs at a higher processing speed of 0.85 GHz, while Plum Flix runs at 0.8 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 the better performer.
Display: Plum Flix offers a screen size of 3.2 inches, while Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 offers 3 inches, making Plum Flix the larger display of the two. Plum Flix features a LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312's TFT, making Plum Flix the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Plum Flix offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 offers 2 MP, making Plum Flix better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Both Plum Flix and Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 offer the same 1200 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Plum Flix offers 256 GB, making Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Plum Flix
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Duos S5312
₹7,340
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 May, 2012
|
25 Jun, 2013
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6573
|
Broadcom BCM21654
|
|
(upto 800 MHz)
|
(upto 850 MHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
320x480 px
|
240x320 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
N/A
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1200 mAh
|
Storage
|
256 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.8/5
(947 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6573
|
Broadcom BCM21654
|
Processor
|
800 MHz
|
Single core, 850 MHz, Cortex A9
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
Broadcom VideoCore IV
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320x480 px
|
240x320 px
|
Pixel Density
|
180 ppi
|
133 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
49.53 %
|
45.98 %
|
Design
Height
|
108 mm
|
104.95 mm
|
Width
|
57 mm
|
57.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
14.50 mm
|
11.8 mm
|
Weight
|
90 grams
|
100.2 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
320x240 @ 15 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 4(2G)
|
Up to 6 Hours(3G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
256 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.85 W/kg Body: 0.60 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Applications
|
Document Viewer Google Search Maps Gmail YouTube Calendar Google Talk Picasa integration
|
Document Viewer
|