Rage RQ 102 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad

Comparing the Rage RQ 102 vs Micromax Q50 Ezpad across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax Q50 Ezpad offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Rage RQ 102 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Q50 Ezpad better for rear camera photography.

Rage RQ 102

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q50 Ezpad

₹4,335

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Sep, 2010

07 Oct, 2010

User Ratings

N/A	3.5/5 (17 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

N/A	240x320 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.93 %

Design

Height

N/A

114 mm

Width

N/A

60 mm

Thickness

N/A

10.40 mm

Weight

N/A

96 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 16 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV with 3.5 mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Auto Call Recorder Voice Changer Black List Feature

N/A