|
84%
realme 16 Pro
₹36,999
|
79%
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
₹34,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme 16 Pro vs OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Comparing the realme 16 Pro vs OPPO F33 Pro 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme 16 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,869, while OPPO F33 Pro 5G scores 2,042, making realme 16 Pro the better performer.
Display: realme 16 Pro offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while OPPO F33 Pro 5G offers 6.57 inches, making realme 16 Pro the larger display of the two. Both realme 16 Pro and OPPO F33 Pro 5G feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: realme 16 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 200 MP, while OPPO F33 Pro 5G offers 50 MP, making realme 16 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme 16 Pro and OPPO F33 Pro 5G feature a 50 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both realme 16 Pro and OPPO F33 Pro 5G offer the same 7000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both realme 16 Pro and OPPO F33 Pro 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme 16 Pro and OPPO F33 Pro 5G equally at 8.
User Rating: realme 16 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while OPPO F33 Pro 5G has a rating of 4.3.
|
realme 16 Pro
₹36,999
@ Amazon
|
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
₹34,999
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
84%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
12 Jan, 2026
|
15 Apr, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.57 inches (16.69 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1272x2772 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2372 px (FHD+)
|
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
200 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Mono Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
|
50 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
|
80W Super Flash Charging
|
80W Super VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(2,257 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(92 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
983,589
AnTuTu Score
|
651,333
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 18m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 06, 2026
(Official)
|
Apr 15, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
3 Year
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
4 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max MT6878
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6360 Max
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MP2
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
983,589
|
651,333
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
31.0 s
|
33.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
862
|
366
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
32.5 %
|
24.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.57 inches (16.69 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1272x2772 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2372 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
600 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1400 nits
|
1400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.6:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
450 ppi
|
397 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
89.24 %
|
88.76 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
93.57 %
|
92.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.60 mm
|
158.4 mm
|
Width
|
77.60 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.75 mm
|
8.3 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
194 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic Vegan Leather
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes IP68 IP66 IP69K IP69
|
Yes Water resistant IP69K
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
200 MP
Primary Camera30x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 84° field-of-view23 mm focal length 1/1.56" sensor size S5KHP5 0.5µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Mono Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
12288 x 16384 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
30 x Digital Zoom
|
10 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps HD @30/60 fps |
Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @30/60 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Video HDR
Video Pro Mode |
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera1/2.88" sensor size 0.61µm pixel size |
50 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
7000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 80W Super Flash Charging 50% in 23 minutes
|
Yes 80W Super VOOC Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 18m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 49m 0s
|
0h 49m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 3500(band 48) / 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.819 W/kg Body: 0.761 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.4
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
IR Blaster
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
Related Comparisons
realme 16 Pro
vivo V70 FE
realme 16 Pro
realme 15 Pro 5G
realme 16 Pro
vivo X300 FE
realme 16 Pro
realme 16
realme 16 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
realme 16 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
realme 16 Pro
Nothing Phone 4a
realme 16 Pro
vivo T5 Pro
realme 16 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
realme 16 Pro
realme 16T 5G
realme 16 Pro
OnePlus Nord CE 6 5G
realme 16 Pro
OPPO Reno15 C
realme 16 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
realme 16 Pro
OnePlus Nord 6
realme 16 Pro
realme GT 7
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
vivo V70 FE
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OPPO F33 5G
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Samsung Galaxy A37 5G
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
vivo X300 FE
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OPPO Reno15 C
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
realme 16
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
vivo T5 Pro
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
vivo V70
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OPPO F31 Pro
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OPPO F31 Pro Plus
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
OnePlus Nord CE 6 5G
OPPO F33 Pro 5G
Motorola Edge 60 Pro