|
83%
realme P4
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
realme Narzo 90X
₹17,499
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme P4 vs realme Narzo 90X
Comparing the realme P4 vs realme Narzo 90X across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme P4 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.6 GHz, while realme Narzo 90X runs at 2.4 GHz, making realme P4 the better performer.
Display: realme Narzo 90X offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while realme P4 offers 6.77 inches, making realme Narzo 90X the larger display of the two. realme P4 features a Hyper Glow AMOLED display compared to realme Narzo 90X's LCD, making realme P4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both realme P4 and realme Narzo 90X feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: realme P4 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while realme Narzo 90X offers 8 MP, making realme P4 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both realme P4 and realme Narzo 90X offer the same 7000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both realme P4 and realme Narzo 90X offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: realme P4 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while realme Narzo 90X has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
realme P4
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 90X
₹17,499
@ Amazon
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
83%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
20 Aug, 2025
|
23 Dec, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.6 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.77 inches (17.2 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
Hyper Glow AMOLED
|
LCD
|
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
720x1570 px (HD+)
|
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
|
80W Ultra Charging
|
60W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.1/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(22,520 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(4,725 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
775,973
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
17h 22m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹17,499
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 20, 2025
(Official)
|
Dec 16, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v15
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
3 Years
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
4 Years
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G615 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
775,973
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
27.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
12.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
Hyper Glow AMOLED
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.77 inches (17.2 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2392 px (FHD+)
|
720x1570 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
4500 nits
|
N/A
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
975 nits
|
HBM Brightness
|
1600 nits
|
1200 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.9:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
387 ppi
|
254 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
89.28 %
|
87.52 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
94 %
|
90.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.34 mm
|
166.07 mm
|
Width
|
75.88 mm
|
77.93 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.58 mm
|
8.28 mm
|
Weight
|
185 grams
|
212 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP66 IP65
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size OV50D CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.61µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
8192 x 6144 Pixels
|
3072 x 4096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @240 fps |
Full HD @30/60/120 fps
HD @30/60/120/240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion |
Slow Motion
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/3.09" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
7000 mAh
|
7000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 56.3 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 5.5 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 80W Ultra Charging 50% in 25 minutes
|
Yes 60W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 22m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 59m 0s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.981 W/kg Body: 0.907 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.4
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹17,499
|
Related Comparisons
realme P4
realme P4x
realme P4
realme P4 Pro
realme P4
vivo T5x
realme P4
OPPO K13 5G
realme P4
realme P3 Ultra
realme P4
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
realme P4
realme P3
realme P4
realme P4 Power
realme P4
realme P4R 5G
realme P4
vivo T4
realme P4
OnePlus N6 5G
realme P4
iQOO Z10R
realme P4
vivo T4R
realme P4
realme Narzo 80 Pro
realme P4
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
realme Narzo 90X
realme P4x
realme Narzo 90X
realme P4R 5G
realme Narzo 90X
Moto G57 Power
realme Narzo 90X
OPPO K14x 5G
realme Narzo 90X
Samsung Galaxy M17 5G
realme Narzo 90X
vivo T4X
realme Narzo 90X
POCO M7 Plus
realme Narzo 90X
OPPO K14 5G
realme Narzo 90X
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
realme Narzo 90X
iQOO Z11x
realme Narzo 90X
realme P4 Power
realme Narzo 90X
OnePlus Nord CE 6 Lite 5G
realme Narzo 90X
realme 16T 5G
realme Narzo 90X
vivo X300 FE