Rocker Chetak vs Umeox Eflippy

Comparing the Rocker Chetak vs Umeox Eflippy across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Rocker Chetak and Umeox Eflippy offer the same screen size of 1.8 inches and feature the same TFT display.

Rear Camera: Both Rocker Chetak and Umeox Eflippy feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Umeox Eflippy offers a higher battery capacity with 700 mAh, while Rocker Chetak offers 1500 mAh, making Umeox Eflippy better for longer battery life.

Rocker Chetak

(Discontinued)

Umeox Eflippy

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

11 Nov, 2013

24 Feb, 2014

Display

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)	1.8 inches (4.57 cm)
TFT	TFT
128x160 px	64x128 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1500 mAh

700 mAh

Storage

N/A

4 MB

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

TFT

Screen Size

1.8 inches (4.57 cm)

Resolution

128x160 px

64x128 px

Pixel Density

114 ppi

80 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

16.24 %

Design

Height

N/A

99 mm

Width

N/A

52 mm

Thickness

N/A

17.6 mm

Form Factor

N/A

Clamshell

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Image Resolution

640 x 480 Pixels

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

1500 mAh

700 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 10 Hours(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

N/A

4 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 8 GB

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Single SIM

SIM Type

N/A	SIM1: Mini

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Video Player

Yes Video Formats: MPEG4

Ring Tone

Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: MP3

Yes Music Formats: AMR MP3

Special Features

Multi Languages Auto Call Recording Mobile Tracker

N/A

Sensors

Games

Yes

Browser

WAP

Yes WAP

Phone Book

Yes Limited

Other Facilities

Calculator World clock Calendar Alarm

Calculator Stopwatch World clock Calendar Alarm