Rocker Pulsar vs Micromax X258

Comparing the Rocker Pulsar vs Micromax X258 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Rocker Pulsar and Micromax X258 offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches, but Rocker Pulsar features a LCD display compared to Micromax X258's TFT, making Rocker Pulsar the better display of the two.

Rear Camera: Both Rocker Pulsar and Micromax X258 feature a 0.3 MP primary rear camera.

Battery: Rocker Pulsar offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Micromax X258 offers 1750 mAh, making Rocker Pulsar better for longer battery life.

Rocker Pulsar

(Discontinued)

Micromax X258

₹1,999

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

14 May, 2012

27 Nov, 2013

User Ratings

N/A	3.7/5 (224 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

TFT

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

29.41 %

Display Colour

N/A

65K

Design

Height

N/A

119 mm

Width

N/A

51 mm

Thickness

N/A

14.5 mm

Weight

N/A

100 grams

Build Material

N/A	Frame: Plastic Back: Plastic

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

N/A

Image Resolution

N/A	640 x 480 Pixels

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

2000 mAh

1750 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 6 Hours(2G)

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

N/A	SIM1: Mini

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

N/A

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v3.0

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: 3GP MPEG4

Ring Tone

N/A	Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: AAC MIDI MP3 WAV

Sensors

Games

N/A

Yes

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes Limited 500 entries

SMS

Yes

100

MMS

Yes

N/A