Sagetel F16 vs Micromax X264

Comparing the Sagetel F16 vs Micromax X264 across display and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Sagetel F16 and Micromax X264 offer the same screen size of 2.4 inches, but Sagetel F16 features a LCD display compared to Micromax X264's TFT, making Sagetel F16 the better display of the two.

Battery: Micromax X264 offers a higher battery capacity with 900 mAh, while Sagetel F16 offers 1070 mAh, making Micromax X264 better for longer battery life.

Sagetel F16

(Discontinued)

Micromax X264

₹1,379

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	02 Sep, 2013

User Ratings

N/A	3.9/5 (374 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

TFT

Screen Size

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

240x320 px

Pixel Density

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

33.65 %

30.87 %

Display Colour

N/A

65K

Design

Height

102 mm

118 mm

Width

52 mm

49 mm

Thickness

13.00 mm

14.3 mm

Rear Camera

Resolution

N/A	0.3 MP Primary Camera

Image Resolution

N/A	640 x 480 Pixels

Camera Features

N/A	5 x Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

1070 mAh

900 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4.5(2G)

N/A

Storage

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

N/A

Bluetooth

Yes

Yes v3.0

Multimedia

Video Player

N/A	Yes Video Formats: AVI MPEG4

Ring Tone

N/A	Music ringtones Polyphonic ringtones Vibration

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: MP3 WAV

Special Features

N/A	Torch Light Multi Languages

Sensors

Games

N/A

Yes

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Yes WAP

Phone Book

Yes	Yes Limited 450 entries

SMS

Yes	Yes SMS Storage 150

MMS

Yes

N/A

Other Facilities

N/A	Calculator Stopwatch Calendar Alarm