Samsung ATIV S Neo
₹29,990
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung ATIV S Neo vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Samsung ATIV S Neo vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung ATIV S Neo runs at a higher processing speed of 1.4 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making Samsung ATIV S Neo the better performer.
Display: Samsung ATIV S Neo offers a screen size of 4.77 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Samsung ATIV S Neo the larger display of the two. Both Samsung ATIV S Neo and Lava Iris 406q feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Samsung ATIV S Neo offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making Samsung ATIV S Neo better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung ATIV S Neo offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.2 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making Samsung ATIV S Neo better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung ATIV S Neo offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Samsung ATIV S Neo better for longer battery life.
Storage: Lava Iris 406q offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Samsung ATIV S Neo offers 16 GB, making Lava Iris 406q the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung ATIV S Neo
₹29,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
16 Aug, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.4 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
4.77 inches (12.12 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.4 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.77 inches (12.12 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
308 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
67.29 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
135 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
69 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
144 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 fps
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 15 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.91 W/kg Body: 1.52 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|