Samsung ATIV S vs Philips Xenium W736
Comparing the Samsung ATIV S vs Philips Xenium W736 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung ATIV S runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Philips Xenium W736 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Samsung ATIV S the better performer.
Display: Samsung ATIV S offers a screen size of 4.8 inches, while Philips Xenium W736 offers 4 inches, making Samsung ATIV S the larger display of the two. Samsung ATIV S features a Super AMOLED display compared to Philips Xenium W736's LCD, making Samsung ATIV S the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung ATIV S offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Philips Xenium W736 offers 5 MP, making Samsung ATIV S better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung ATIV S offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.9 MP, while Philips Xenium W736 offers 0.3 MP, making Samsung ATIV S better for front camera photography.
Battery: Philips Xenium W736 offers a higher battery capacity with 2400 mAh, while Samsung ATIV S offers 2300 mAh, making Philips Xenium W736 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Philips Xenium W736 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Samsung ATIV S offers 32 GB, making Philips Xenium W736 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung ATIV S
|
✕
Philips Xenium W736
|
Add to Compare
|