Samsung C275 vs Micromax Q5fb

Comparing the Samsung C275 vs Micromax Q5fb across storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Storage: Samsung C275 offers higher internal storage with 600 GB, while Micromax Q5fb offers 15 GB, making Samsung C275 the better option for storage.

Samsung C275

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q5fb

₹6,999

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2008

15 Jan, 2010

Display

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)
128.00x 128 pixels , 1.5 inches px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

N/A	2 MP Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

600 KB

15 MB

User Ratings

N/A	3/5 (3 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Screen Size

N/A	2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

128.00x 128 pixels 1.5 inches px

320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A

182 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

21.04 %

Design

Height

88.00 mm

115 mm

Width

45.00 mm

62 mm

Thickness

19.80 mm

12.50 mm

Weight

74 grams

95 grams

Form Factor

Clamshell

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

N/A	2 MP Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 6(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

600 KB

15 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback

Sensors

Java

No	Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	Yes 1000 entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Flight Mode Facebook Opera Mini Multi-Messenger Conference Call Speed Dial STK