Samsung C3060R vs Micromax X600

Comparing the Samsung C3060R vs Micromax X600 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Micromax X600 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Samsung C3060R offers 1.3 MP, making Micromax X600 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: Micromax X600 offers higher internal storage with 78 GB, while Samsung C3060R offers 15 GB, making Micromax X600 the better option for storage.

Samsung C3060R

(Discontinued)

Micromax X600

₹1,499

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jun, 2009

24 Jul, 2010

Display

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)
LCD	LCD
320.00x 320 pixels , 2.2 inches px	320x240 px

Rear Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

N/A

1000 mAh

Storage

15 MB

78 MB

User Ratings

N/A	3.7/5 (45 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

N/A	3.2 inches (8.13 cm)

Resolution

320.00x 320 pixels 2.2 inches px

320x240 px

Pixel Density

N/A

125 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

50.15 %

Design

Height

114.00 mm

113 mm

Width

48.40 mm

56 mm

Thickness

15.40 mm

12.70 mm

Weight

95 grams

110 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 7(2G)

Up to 5(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

15 MB

78 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 4 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

500 entries Photocall

Yes 1000 Entries

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Mobile Tracker Organizer Voice memo T9

N/A