Samsung C400
|
Philips 162
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung C400 vs Philips 162
Share
Comparing the Samsung C400 vs Philips 162 across storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Storage: Philips 162 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Samsung C400 offers 1 GB, making Philips 162 the better option for storage.
|
Samsung C400
|
Philips 162
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
01 Sep, 2006
|
01 Jan, 2005
|
Display
|
LCD
|
N/A
|
|
160.00x 160 pixels px
|
80.00x 80 pixels , 5 lines px
|
Rear Camera
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
1.8 MB
|
4 MB
|
User Feedback
Display
Display Type
|
LCD
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
160.00x 160 pixels px
|
80.00x 80 pixels 5 lines px
|
Design
Height
|
85.50 mm
|
98.00 mm
|
Width
|
43.40 mm
|
45.00 mm
|
Thickness
|
16.00 mm
|
18.50 mm
|
Weight
|
85 grams
|
82 grams
|
Form Factor
|
Clamshell
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
N/A
|
Battery
TalkTime
|
Up to 6(2G)
|
Up to 4(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
1.8 MB
|
4 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Single SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
No
|
No
|
Bluetooth
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Music
|
Yes Music Formats: No
|
Yes Music Formats: No
|
Sensors
Java
|
Yes MIDP 2.0
|
No
|
Browser
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Other Facilities
|
N/A
|
Facilities
|